Dear Reader: If you wish to see some previous rounds of philosophical analyses and deconstructions on this blog, we’ve listed them below:
Introductory explanation: http://errorstatistics.com/2012/01/13/u-phil-so-you-want-to-do-a-philosophical-analysis/
Mayo on Jim Berger: http://errorstatistics.com/2011/12/11/irony-and-bad-faith-deconstructing-bayesians-1/
Contributed deconstructions of J. Berger: http://errorstatistics.com/2011/12/26/contributed-deconstructions-irony-bad-faith-3/
J. Berger on J. Berger: http://errorstatistics.com/2011/12/29/jim-berger-on-jim-berger/
Mayo on Senn: http://errorstatistics.com/2012/01/15/mayo-philosophizes-on-stephen-senn-how-can-we-cultivate-senns-ability/
Others on Senn: http://errorstatistics.com/2012/01/22/u-phil-stephen-senn-1-c-robert-a-jaffe-and-mayo-brief-remarks/
Gelman on Senn: http://errorstatistics.com/2012/01/23/u-phil-stephen-senn-2-andrew-gelman/
Senn on Senn: http://errorstatistics.com/2012/01/24/u-phil-3-stephen-senn-on-stephen-senn/
Mayo, Senn & Wasserman on Gelman: http://errorstatistics.com/2012/03/06/2645/
Hennig on Gelman: http://errorstatistics.com/2012/03/10/a-further-comment-on-gelman-by-c-hennig/
Deconstructing Dutch books: http://errorstatistics.com/2012/04/15/3376/
There are likely others, but this should do; if you care to write on my previous post (send directly to error@vt.edu).
Sincerely,
D Mayo
