fallacy of non-significance

P-values as posterior odds?

METABLOG QUERYI don’t know how to explain to this economist blogger that he is erroneously using p-values when he claims that “the odds are” (1 – p)/p that a null hypothesis is false. Maybe others want to jump in here?

On significance and model validation (Lars Syll)

Let us suppose that we as educational reformers have a hypothesis that implementing a voucher system would raise the mean test results with 100 points (null hypothesis). Instead, when sampling, it turns out it only raises it with 75 points and having a standard error (telling us how much the mean varies from one sample to another) of 20. Read more »

Categories: fallacy of non-significance, Severity, Statistics | 36 Comments

Blog at WordPress.com. Theme: Customized Adventure Journal by Contexture International.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 91 other followers