Msc Kvetch: A question on the Martin-Zimmerman case we do not hear

questionmark pinkThis is off topic, but a question I don’t hear people ask in regard to the Zimmerman case is: why didn’t any of the several people hearing screams intervene to stop the brawl? Never mind who was screaming, no one felt an obligation to intervene. Eye-witness John Good came out and said something like “stop” but then immediately ran back inside. Others could be heard saying, “don’t go out there”. I don’t say they should have joined the fight, but if a few people had gone outside and screamed or blew a whistle it probably would have been effective.

(I’ve been in such situations twice.)

Categories: msc kvetch | 5 Comments

Post navigation

5 thoughts on “Msc Kvetch: A question on the Martin-Zimmerman case we do not hear

  1. Nathan Schachtman

    I did follow the testimony as it unfolded. The testimony is, as you probably know, available on Youtube. A quick look at some contemporaneous news accounts describe’s Good as stating that he heard noises, investigated, saw a scuffle, yelled to the combatants to stop, and went to call 911, when he heard the gunshot. His testimony supported GZ’s account that Martin was on top of him, and beating him.

    Now Good did not know that there would be a gun fired, and you might well ask why did he just shout to stop, rather than running out and separating the two people. Still, his actions, while not heroic, were not totally unreasonable.

    Interestingly, we could say that Good’s decision not to intervene directly was the “but for” cause of the shooting. The law generally requires “but for” causation PLUS a vague concept called “proximate causation,” which is not always proximate in the sense of close.

  2. Nathan: Yes, and GZ says he told Good the police were already on their way, that he should help him instead. Something like that. So, in a sense, legally, you’re saying, Good was a cause? Of course there were other people too.

  3. Anonymous

    Fear of injury, hesitancy to get involved. MYOB.

  4. Little bit of irony? Zimmerman emerges from hiding to rescue a family from an overturned vehicle last week! (even as he was being villified—it is like a Tom Wolf novel).

I welcome constructive comments that are of relevance to the post and the discussion, and discourage detours into irrelevant topics, however interesting, or unconstructive declarations that "you (or they) are just all wrong". If you want to correct or remove a comment, send me an e-mail. If readers have already replied to the comment, you may be asked to replace it to retain comprehension.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at