Monthly Archives: July 2019
Summer Seminar in PhilStat Participants and Special Invited Speakers
The NEJM Issues New Guidelines on Statistical Reporting: Is the ASA P-Value Project Backfiring? (i)
The New England Journal of Medicine NEJM announced new guidelines for authors for statistical reporting yesterday*. The ASA describes the change as “in response to the ASA Statement on P-values and Statistical Significance and subsequent The American Statistician special issue on statistical inference” (ASA I and II,(note) in my abbreviation). If so, it seems to have backfired. I don’t know all the differences in the new guidelines, but those explicitly noted appear to me to move in the reverse direction from where the ASA I and II(note) guidelines were heading.
The most notable point is that the NEJM highlights the need for error control, especially for constraining the Type I error probability, and pays a lot of attention to adjusting P-values for multiple testing and post hoc subgroups. ASA I included an important principle (#4) that P-values are altered and may be invalidated by multiple testing, but they do not call for adjustments for multiplicity, nor do I find a discussion of Type I or II error probabilities in the ASA documents. NEJM gives strict requirements for controlling family-wise error rate or false discovery rates (understood as the Benjamini and Hochberg frequentist adjustments). Continue reading
B. Haig: The ASA’s 2019 update on P-values and significance (ASA II)(Guest Post)
Brian Haig, Professor Emeritus
Department of Psychology
University of Canterbury
Christchurch, New Zealand
The American Statistical Association’s (ASA) recent effort to advise the statistical and scientific communities on how they should think about statistics in research is ambitious in scope. It is concerned with an initial attempt to depict what empirical research might look like in “a world beyond p<0.05” (The American Statistician, 2019, 73, S1,1-401). Quite surprisingly, the main recommendation of the lead editorial article in the Special Issue of The American Statistician devoted to this topic (Wasserstein, Schirm, & Lazar, 2019; hereafter, ASA II(note)) is that “it is time to stop using the term ‘statistically significant’ entirely”. (p.2) ASA II(note) acknowledges the controversial nature of this directive and anticipates that it will be subject to critical examination. Indeed, in a recent post, Deborah Mayo began her evaluation of ASA II(note) by making constructive amendments to three recommendations that appear early in the document (‘Error Statistics Philosophy’, June 17, 2019). These amendments have received numerous endorsements, and I record mine here. In this short commentary, I briefly state a number of general reservations that I have about ASA II(note). Continue reading
SIST: All Excerpts and Mementos: May 2018-June 2020 (updated)
The Meaning of My Title: Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars* 05/19/18
Blurbs of 16 Tours: Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars (SIST) 03/05/19
Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: Preface
Excursion 1
EXCERPTS
Tour I Ex1 TI (full proofs)
Excursion 1 Tour I: Beyond Probabilism and Performance: Severity Requirement (1.1) 09/08/18
Excursion 1 Tour I (2nd stop): Probabilism, Performance, and Probativeness (1.2) 09/11/18
Excursion 1 Tour I (3rd stop): The Current State of Play in Statistical Foundations: A View From a Hot-Air Balloon (1.3) 09/15/18
Tour II Ex1 TII (full proofs)
Excursion 1 Tour II: Error Probing Tools versus Logics of Evidence-Excerpt 04/04/19
Souvenir C: A Severe Tester’s Translation Guide (Excursion 1 Tour II) 11/08/18
MEMENTOS
Tour Guide Mementos (Excursion 1 Tour II of How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars) 10/29/18
Excursion 2
EXCERPTS
Tour I (full proofs)
Excursion 2: Taboos of Induction and Falsification: Tour I (first stop) 09/29/18
“It should never be true, though it is still often said, that the conclusions are no more accurate than the data on which they are based” (Keepsake by Fisher, 2.1) 10/05/18
Tour II (full proofs)
Excursion 2 Tour II (3rd stop): Falsification, Pseudoscience, Induction (2.3) 10/10/18
Ex 2 TII (Full proofs)
MEMENTOS
Tour Guide Mementos and Quiz 2.1 (Excursion 2 Tour I Induction and Confirmation) 11/14/18
Mementos for Excursion 2 Tour II Falsification, Pseudoscience, Induction 11/17/18
Excursion 3
EXCERPTS
Tour I Ex3 TI (full proofs)
Where are Fisher, Neyman, Pearson in 1919? Opening of Excursion 3 11/30/18
Neyman-Pearson Tests: An Episode in Anglo-Polish Collaboration: Excerpt from Excursion 3 (3.2) 12/01/18
First Look at N-P Methods as Severe Tests: Water plant accident [Exhibit (i) from Excursion 3] 12/04/18
Tour II Ex3 TII (full proofs)
It’s the Methods, Stupid: Excerpt from Excursion 3 Tour II (Mayo 2018, CUP) 12/11/18
60 Years of Cox’s (1958) Chestnut: Excerpt from Excursion 3 tour II. 12/29/18
Tour III Ex3 Tour III(full proofs)
Capability and Severity: Deeper Concepts: Excerpts From Excursion 3 Tour III 12/20/18
MEMENTOS
Memento & Quiz (on SEV): Excursion 3, Tour I 12/08/18
Mementos for “It’s the Methods, Stupid!” Excursion 3 Tour II (3.4-3.6) 12/13/18
Tour Guide Mementos From Excursion 3 Tour III: Capability and Severity: Deeper Concepts 12/26/18
Excursion 4
EXCERPTS
Tour I (Full Excursion 4 Tour I)
Excerpt from Excursion 4 Tour I: The Myth of “The Myth of Objectivity” (Mayo 2018, CUP) 12/26/18
Tour II (Full Excursion 4 Tour II)
Excerpt from Excursion 4 Tour II: 4.4 “Do P-Values Exaggerate the Evidence?” 01/10/19
Tour III (Full proofs of Excursion 4 Tour III)
Tour IV (Full proofs of Excursion 4 Tour IV)
Excerpt from Excursion 4 Tour IV: More Auditing: Objectivity and Model Checking 01/27/19
MEMENTOS
Mementos from Excursion 4: Blurbs of Tours I-IV 01/13/19
Excursion 5
Tour I (full proofs)
(Full) Excerpt: Excursion 5 Tour I — Power: Pre-data and Post-data (from “SIST: How to Get Beyond the Stat Wars”) 04/27/19
Tour II (full proofs)
(Full) Excerpt. Excursion 5 Tour II: How Not to Corrupt Power (Power Taboos, Retro Power, and Shpower) 06/07/19
Tour III (full proofs)
Deconstructing the Fisher-Neyman conflict wearing Fiducial glasses + Excerpt 5.8 from SIST 02/23/19
Excursion 6
Tour I (full proofs) What Ever Happened to Bayesian Foundations?
Tour II (full proofs)
Excerpts: Souvenir Z: Understanding Tribal Warfare + 6.7 Farewell Keepsake from SIST + List of Souvenirs 05/04/19 (full excerpt)
*Statistical Inference as Severe Testing: How to Get Beyond the Statistics Wars (Mayo, CUP 2018).