Phil 6334: February 20, 2014 (Spanos): Day #5

may-4-8-aris-spanos-e2809contology-methodology-in-statistical-modelinge2809dPHIL 6334 – “Probability/Statistics Lecture Notes 3 for 2/20/14: Estimation (Point and Interval)”:(Prof. Spanos)*

*This is Day #5 on the Syllabus, as Day #4 had to be made up (Feb 24, 2014) due to snow. Slides for Day #4 will go up Feb. 26, 2014. (See the revised Syllabus Second Installment.)

Categories: Phil6334, Philosophy of Statistics, Spanos | 5 Comments

Post navigation

5 thoughts on “Phil 6334: February 20, 2014 (Spanos): Day #5

  1. Inconsistent jargon alert! On page 25, precision and accuracy are equated. In the science jargon I was taught in both high school and university, the term “accuracy” is scientist jargon for what a statistician would call lack of bias and the term “precision” is scientist jargon for what a statistician would call low variance. So a measurement might any of the four possible combinations of high/low accuracy, high/low precision. (A low accuracy, high precision measurement indicates “systematic error”, that is, it’s tantamount to a poorly calibrated instrument.)

    • Aris Spanos

      Corey: on page 25 there is no mention of “accuracy”. What is mentioned on that page is “reliability and precision” which refer to very different notions.

  2. It’s kind of retro to read that unbiasedness is a desirable or “optimal” property, especially coming from a time series guy. (I assume that all econometricians are time series experts, right?)

    When I was young and unformed (i.e., before I learned of the Bayesian approach) I was taking this course. The Robert E. Kearney who teaches it is a time series expert (and was also my graduate thesis advisor). He was teaching us about autocorrelation estimators, and he mentioned that the biased one was generally preferred over the unbiased one. I asked why anyone would ever prefer a biased estimator when an unbiased one was available; his answer, which I didn’t understand at the time, can be boiled down to “mean-sqaured-error bias-variance tradeoff”. I later saw the logic for myself when I tried both the biased and unbiased estimators on simulated data for a class assignment.

I welcome constructive comments that are of relevance to the post and the discussion, and discourage detours into irrelevant topics, however interesting, or unconstructive declarations that "you (or they) are just all wrong". If you want to correct or remove a comment, send me an e-mail. If readers have already replied to the comment, you may be asked to replace it to retain comprehension.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: