“Fraudulent until proved innocent: Is this really the new “Bayesian Forensics”? (rejected post)

Objectivity 1: Will the Real Junk Science Please Stand Up?Fraudulent until proved innocent: Is this really the new “Bayesian Forensics”? (rejected post)

 

 

 

Categories: evidence-based policy, frequentist/Bayesian, junk science, Rejected Posts

Post navigation

2 thoughts on ““Fraudulent until proved innocent: Is this really the new “Bayesian Forensics”? (rejected post)

  1. What a fascinating “rejected post” topic. I will read it very carefully to see if I have anything to contribute on this …

    • I haven’t had time to study or post the longer story in relation to Jens Forster.

Blog at WordPress.com.