3 Commentaries on my Editorial are being published in Conservation Biology

 

 

There are 3 commentaries soon to be published in Conservation Biology on my editorial, “The statistics wars and intellectual conflicts of interest” also published in Conservation Biology.

.

Professor Philip B. Stark
Department of Statistics
University of California, Berkeley

You can read a draft of Philip Stark’s commentary here

 

.

Professor Christian Hennig
Department of Statistical Sciences “Paolo Fortunati”
University of Bologna.

Here is a draft of Christian Hennig’s commentary

 

 

Kent Staley and John Park , who each wrote individual commentaries for the blog, joined forces to write a joint commentary for the journal. You can read the draft here.

.

Kent W. Staley
Professor, Coordinator of Graduate Studies
Department of Philosophy
Saint Louis University

 

 

.

 

 

John Park, MD
Radiation Oncologist
Kansas City VA Medical Center

 

A commentary by Lakens will appear in the psychology journal that adopted the “abandon significance” recommendation discussed in my editorial. Others may appear as letters or part of longer papers elsewhere. I will update this blog once I have that information. I’m very impressed with these interesting, interdisciplinary efforts, and grateful to all the authors for pursuing them.

All of the initial blog commentaries on Mayo’s (2021) editorial (up through Jan 18, 2022) are below*

Schachtman
Park
Dennis
Stark
Staley
Pawitan
Hennig
Ionides and Ritov
Haig
Lakens

*After David Cox dies on January 18, 2022, I posted some memorial items. Two additional commentaries posted later are by Paul Daniels and Yu-li Ko.

For background: The slides and video from our January 11, 2022 Forum, with presentations by Y. Benjamini, D. Hand and I, which grew out of my editorial, can be found here:

January 11 Forum: “Statistical Significance Test Anxiety” : Benjamini, Mayo, Hand

Categories: Mayo editorial, significance tests | Tags: , , , , | Leave a comment

Post navigation

I welcome constructive comments that are of relevance to the post and the discussion, and discourage detours into irrelevant topics, however interesting, or unconstructive declarations that "you (or they) are just all wrong". If you want to correct or remove a comment, send me an e-mail. If readers have already replied to the comment, you may be asked to replace it to retain comprehension.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.