LSE PH 500

[3] December Leisurely Tour Meeting 3: SIST Excursion 3 Tour III

2024 Cruise

We are now at stop 3 on our December leisurely cruise through SIST: Excursion 3 Tour III. I am pasting the slides and video from this session during the LSE Research Seminars in 2020 (from which this cruise derives). (Remember it was early pandemic, and we weren’t so adept with zooming.)  The Higgs discussion clarifies (and defends) a somewhat controversial interpretation of p-values. (If you’re interested in the Higgs discovery, there’s a lot more on this blog you can find with the search. Ben Recht recently blogged that the Higgs discovery did not take place. HEP physicists roundly responded. I would omit the section on “capability and severity” were I to write a second edition, while keeping the duality of tests and CIs. Share your remarks in the comments.

.

 

 

 

Continue reading

Categories: 2024 Leisurely Cruise, confidence intervals and tests, LSE PH 500 | Leave a comment

Excursion 1 Tour II (4th stop): The Law of Likelihood and Error Statistics (1.4)

Ship Statinfasst

We are starting on Tour II of Excursion 1 (4th stop).  The 3rd stop is in an earlier blog post. As I promised, this cruise of SIST is leisurely. I have not yet shared new reflections in the comments–but I will! 

Where YOU are in the journey: Continue reading

Categories: Bayesian/frequentist, Likelihood Principle, LSE PH 500 | Leave a comment

David Hand: Trustworthiness of Statistical Analysis (LSE PH 500 presentation)

This was David Hand’s guest presentation (25 June) at our zoomed graduate research seminar (LSE PH500) on Current Controversies in Phil Stat (~30 min.)  I’ll make some remarks in the comments, and invite yours.

.

Trustworthiness of Statistical Analysis

David Hand

Abstract: Trust in statistical conclusions derives from the trustworthiness of the data and analysis methods. Trustworthiness of the analysis methods can be compromised by misunderstanding and incorrect application. However, that should stimulate a call for education and regulation, to ensure that methods are used correctly. The alternative of banning potentially useful methods, on the grounds that they are often misunderstood and misused is short-sighted, unscientific, and Procrustean. It damages the capability of science to advance, and feeds into public mistrust of the discipline.

Below are Prof.Hand’s slides w/o audio, followed by a video w/audio. You can also view them on the Meeting #6 post on the PhilStatWars blog (https://phil-stat-wars.com/2020/06/21/meeting-6-june-25/). Continue reading

Categories: LSE PH 500 | Tags: , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.