MONTHLY MEMORY LANE: 3 years ago: March 2012. I mark in red three posts that seem most apt for general background on key issues in this blog* (Posts that are part of a “unit” or a group of “U-Phils” count as one.) This new feature, appearing the last week of each month, began at the blog’s 3-year anniversary in Sept, 2014.
*excluding those recently reblogged.
- (4/1) Philosophy of Statistics: Retraction Watch, Vol. 1, No. 1 (first April Fools)
- (4/3) History and Philosophy of Evidence-Based Health Care
- (4/4) Fallacy of Rejection and the Fallacy of Nouvelle Cuisine
- (4/6) Going Where the Data Take Us
- (4/9) N. Schachtman: Judge Posner’s Digression on Regression
- (4/10) Call for papers: Philosepi?
- (4/12) That Promissory Note From Lehmann’s Letter; Schmidt to Speak
- (4/15) U-Phil: Deconstructing Dynamic Dutch-Books?
- (4/16) A. Spanos: Jerzy Neyman and his Enduring Legacy (recently reblogged)
Contributions from readers in relation to published papers
- (4/17) Earlier U-Phils and Deconstructions
Two book reviews of Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge (EGEK 1996)-counted as 1 unit
- (4/18) Jean Miller: Happy Sweet 16 to EGEK! (Shalizi Review: “We have Ways of Making You Talk”)
- (4/21) Happy Sweet 16 to EGEK #2 (Hasok Chang Review of EGEK)
- (4/23) U-Phil: Jon Williamson: Deconstructing Dynamic Dutch Books
- (4/25) Matching Numbers Across Philosophies
- (4/28) Comedy Hour at the Bayesian Retreat: P-values versus Posteriors